TradeBlock

TradeBlock review guide: everything you need to know in 2025 + clear FAQ

Still searching for TradeBlock and wondering what’s real in 2025—what works, what’s shut down, and where to get the same data today?

You’re not alone. A lot of people land on old reviews, dead links, or stale docs and end up wasting time. I’m going to cut through that mess and point you to what actually matters right now, without the guesswork.

By the time you’re done here, you’ll know whether TradeBlock is relevant for your needs in 2025—and if not, exactly where to go instead.

Why TradeBlock is confusing in 2025

TradeBlock’s name still shows up in docs, code, and blog posts, but the reality behind it changed. That’s where most of the pain starts:

• Old reviews vs. current reality: You’ll see pages praising TradeBlock’s indices and institutional platform, then you hit an inactive page or a redirect that doesn’t match what you expected.


• API references in legacy code: Teams still stumble on snippets pointing to tradeblock.com endpoints for indices or explorer data—only to find 404s or responses you can’t rely on anymore.


• Index business vs. platform confusion: People mix up TradeBlock’s benchmark indices (like XBX) with its institutional trading platform. They didn’t share the same fate.


• XBX questions everywhere: “Where did the XBX Bitcoin Price Index go?” “Is XBX still maintained?” You’ll see it referenced almost daily in research notes and dashboards.


• Explorer nostalgia: Many remember the clean Bitcoin mempool and block visualizations. Those views show up in screenshots and tutorials, but the live tool isn’t something you should plan production workflows around today.


• Price and access confusion: Is there still a paid plan? A free tier? An API key flow? The answers depend on which piece of TradeBlock you mean.

“I followed three ‘official’ links and ended up at a page that doesn’t explain anything about APIs or pricing. Where do I get XBX now?”

That’s a common path. Part of the confusion is that the index unit and the institutional platform didn’t end up in the same place. For example, CoinDesk reported in 2023 that the institutional trading platform branded as TradeBlock was shut down, while benchmark indices like XBX continued under a different brand. If you’ve been chasing links, you’ve likely felt that split firsthand.

What you’ll get here

I’m keeping this simple and practical. I’ll:

• Explain what TradeBlock was and who owned what over time


• Clarify what shut down, what moved to CoinDesk Indices, and what that means for you


• Show you where to access similar data and tools right now (without wasting clicks)


• Answer the questions people keep asking about APIs, pricing, XBX, and the explorer


• Point you to dependable alternatives if you need an explorer, indices, or institutional trading tools

I’ll stick to what’s actively maintained in 2025 and call out anything that’s legacy or risky for production.

Who this guide will help most

• Researchers and analysts: If your reports or models referenced XBX or TradeBlock’s market/chain data.


• Builders and engineers: If you’ve found TradeBlock endpoints in old repos or vendor docs and need a clean migration path.


• Traders and desks: If you used, or were considering, TradeBlock’s institutional tools and now need an equivalent stack.


• Students and educators: If tutorials or course material still mention TradeBlock’s explorer or indices and you need current sources.

Ready to clear it up once and for all? Up next, I’ll lay out what TradeBlock actually was, who owned it, and what still exists in 2025 so you can stop guessing and start using the right tools.

TradeBlock at a glance: what it was, who owned it, and where it stands now

If you’ve ever plugged TradeBlock endpoints into a dashboard, watched its clean Bitcoin mempool charts, or benchmarked against XBX, I get why you’re double-checking its status in 2025. The short version: TradeBlock was once a powerhouse across indices, a blockchain explorer, and institutional trading tools. The brand still echoes in docs and code, but the living, maintained parts have different homes now.

What TradeBlock was known for:

• Indices: Especially the XBX Bitcoin Price Index—widely cited and built with institutional methodology.


• Explorer and analytics: A go-to Bitcoin visualizer for mempool health and block activity.


• Institutional trading/analytics: Tools for routing, execution, and reporting used by professional desks.

“In crypto, dead links aren’t harmless—they quietly break research, PnL, and trust. Build on what’s alive.”

Ownership and changes

Here’s the clean timeline that cuts through the confusion:

• 2013–2014: TradeBlock emerges as a crypto data/tools company and launches its flagship Bitcoin index (XBX).


• 2021: CoinDesk—part of Digital Currency Group (DCG)—acquires TradeBlock’s index business and later rolls it under CoinDesk Indices (CDI), which emphasizes institutional governance and IOSCO-aligned methodologies.


• May 2023: CoinDesk announces it is shutting down the TradeBlock institutional trading platform, citing market and regulatory headwinds. Public notice: CoinDesk: “CoinDesk to Shut Down Its Institutional Trading Platform, TradeBlock.”

Two important signals for anyone assessing reliability today:

• Indices live on under CoinDesk Indices with maintained feeds and documentation—for example, the enduring XBX benchmark now listed as CDI’s XBX.


• The trading platform is no longer active, and support for the TradeBlock-branded stack ended with the 2023 shutdown.

What “TradeBlock” means today

The name still floats around, but in practice it splits into two realities:

• Institutional platform: Shuttered since 2023. Don’t plan integrations or workflows around it.


• Indices: Operated and supported by CoinDesk Indices. If you find “TradeBlock XBX” references, translate that to CDI endpoints and docs.


• Explorer and legacy endpoints: You may see archived pages or sporadic access, but treat them as historical. Anything mission-critical should not rely on these URLs.

Real-world sample I keep hearing from readers: someone tries to revive an old dashboard that pings TradeBlock’s price endpoints—best case they see stale data, worst case they hit 404s. The fix is not to hunt for unofficial mirrors; it’s to move to maintained sources aligned with how the underlying business moved.

Why this matters to you

If you’re scanning this because an old script, institutional memo, or onboarding doc mentions TradeBlock, here’s the practical filter I use:

• You need XBX or benchmark-quality indices: Go straight to CoinDesk Indices. That’s where the methodology, licensing, and feeds live now.


• You were expecting institutional trading/execution tools: Those are retired under the TradeBlock brand, so plan a replacement rather than a revival.


• You wanted the classic explorer: Assume legacy status. Look for an actively maintained explorer to avoid missing blocks or wrong mempool interpretations.


• You see “TradeBlock API” in code: Flag it for migration. If it references index data, map it to CDI. If it’s market data or on-chain metrics, you’ll need a modern, supported API.

I know it’s frustrating when a name you trusted changes shape—especially if it powered reporting or compliance. But the upside is clearer paths and stronger SLAs if you pick the right home for each need. Curious which exact features still exist today—and what you can plug in without babysitting it at 2 a.m.?

Features and tools: what TradeBlock offered vs. what you can actually use now

I’ve been getting the same messages for months: “I found TradeBlock in old docs—what still works?” Here’s the straight answer, tool by tool, with what you can actually use today without breaking your stack.

“In crypto, dead endpoints don’t fail loudly—they quietly corrupt your decisions.”

Indices (XBX and more) — now under CoinDesk Indices

TradeBlock’s flagship benchmarks—most famously the XBX Bitcoin Price Index—now live under CoinDesk Indices. The core value hasn’t changed: transparent methodology, curated exchange selection, and robust outlier handling aimed at institutional use.

Why this matters: reference rates aren’t just “a price.” They decide NAVs, rebalancing ticks, index-tracking error, and even when automated strategies fire. Multiple industry reports (e.g., Bitwise’s 2019 analysis of “real” vs. inflated exchange volume and ongoing liquidity studies from firms like Kaiko) showed how noisy venues can skew a price if you don’t curate sources. That’s exactly the problem XBX-style methodologies are designed to reduce.

If your backtests or valuation models referenced TradeBlock’s index data, here’s how I approach the migration today:

• Confirm methodology parity: Read CoinDesk Indices’ published methods for XBX and related benchmarks so your assumptions match (windows, venue selection, outlier rules).


• Choose the right feed: Real-time vs. delayed, REST vs. WebSocket, plus any fallbacks you need for resiliency.


• Align time and roll conventions: Timezone, day boundaries, and how the index handles stale venues matter for audits and PnL reconciliation.


• Get licensing sorted early: If this touches a commercial product or client reporting, treat licensing with the same seriousness you treat exchange connections.

Practical example: if you rebalance a BTC allocation when your target deviates by 25 bps, a sloppy reference rate can trigger (or miss) rebalances. Minimizing venue noise with benchmark-quality indices is the difference between a clean quarterly report and a day of “why did this fire?”

Institutional trading and analytics — shut down

The execution and analytics stack that once ran under the TradeBlock brand is closed. If you remember its EMS/OMS flavor—smart order routing, execution algos, TCA dashboards—that’s history. The key now is risk-managed migration:

• Export everything: Order logs, fills, TCA, and venue configs. Future audits will ask.


• Map connectivity: Replace venue and broker connections with providers that align to your compliance scope (KYC/AML, reporting, jurisdiction).


• Rebuild your TCA: New routing = new slippage profile. Baseline again with a month of controlled testing before scaling size.


• Run parallel for a spell: If possible, keep a “shadow” environment to validate fills and latencies before you flip the switch fully.

I’ll point you to solid execution and custody options later—right now, treat the old platform as gone.

Blockchain explorer and network analytics — legacy status

TradeBlock’s explorer had a clean Bitcoin mempool view that a lot of us loved. In 2025, don’t bank on it. If you handle user withdrawals, fee policy, or on-chain monitoring, run with actively maintained explorers that publish uptime and changelogs.

What I reach for today, depending on the job:

• Fast fee decisions and mempool health: mempool.space (great vMB mempool visualization, RBF/CPFP insights, fee estimates by target block).


• Bitcoin blocks and transactions with simplicity: Blockstream Explorer.


• Cross-chain search and richer filters: Blockchair (SQL-like filters, address clustering heuristics, export options).


• Ethereum and EVM: Etherscan (and siblings like BscScan, PolygonScan) for token holders, internal txs, ABI decode, and contract verification.

Real-world example: when fees spike, I watch mempool.space’s feerate bands and adjust wallet targets from, say, 10–15 sat/vB to 40–60 sat/vB to hit next-block settlement. If a user flags a “stuck” TX, I check for RBF eligibility or plan CPFP—info the legacy explorer can’t reliably surface now.

API and integrations — consider them deprecated

If your code still calls TradeBlock endpoints, assume they can freeze or vanish. Silent failures here are brutal—your app keeps “working,” but with stale or partial data. Time to swap in supported feeds.

My no-drama migration playbook:

• Inventory usage: Search your repos and dashboards for “tradeblock” in URLs, SDKs, and ETL jobs.


• Stage replacements with parity tests: Swap endpoints behind a feature flag and compare outputs for a week (watch timestamps, units, and null handling).


• Add health checks and 429 logic: Vendors throttle. Implement backoff and multi-provider fallbacks for critical paths.


• Backfill gaps: If you lost historical candles or on-chain metrics, rebuild your history before you re-run models.

Quick mapping guide (what to use instead right now):

• Benchmark index price (e.g., XBX): CoinDesk Indices licensed feeds.


• Exchange spot/derivatives market data (OHLCV, trades, order books): Kaiko, Coin Metrics, or CryptoCompare.


• On-chain metrics (UTXOs, active addresses, supply, fees): Glassnode or Coin Metrics Network Data.


• Bitcoin fee estimates and mempool data: mempool.space API.


• Explorer-style programmatic queries across chains: Blockchair API or Etherscan’s per-chain APIs.

If you’re wondering what’s free, what’s licensed, and how to get reliable access without paying for stuff you don’t need, you’ll want the next section—should you optimize for budget, uptime, or both?

Pricing, access, and support in 2025

Short version: there’s no sign-up or pricing for the institutional platform because it’s closed. What you pay—and how you get in—depends on what you actually need today, which for most readers is benchmark-grade index data now run by CoinDesk Indices, plus reliable third-party explorers if you just want quick lookups.

“The most expensive data is the one you discover is wrong—right after you act on it.”

Is TradeBlock free?

Not in any way that’s dependable for production.

• Legacy explorer pages: historically free to view, but treat any remaining endpoints as unreliable. A 200 OK doesn’t mean the data is fresh.


• Index data (XBX and others): now under CoinDesk Indices and licensed. You can view delayed charts on CoinDesk’s site, but programmatic or commercial use requires a license.


• Need free basics? For casual checks, use public explorers (e.g., mempool.space) or free-tier market APIs (e.g., CoinGecko). For audited reporting or NAVs, don’t risk it—use a licensed benchmark feed.

Getting access today

If you’re after benchmarks like XBX (Bitcoin) or broader digital asset indices, go straight to the current owner and distribution channels.

• For benchmarks:
  
  
  
  • Start at CoinDesk Indices for product lists, methodologies, and licensing.
  
  
  • Ask for delivery options that match your stack: direct API/SFTP, cloud delivery, or market data pipes like Nasdaq GIDS and leading terminals (Bloomberg/Refinitiv/FactSet). This reduces integration time.
  
  
  • Request an evaluation package (sandbox feed + methodology PDFs) and define whether you need real-time, intraday snapshots, or end-of-day. Your cost depends heavily on frequency and redistribution rights.
  
  
  
  


• For public market data and explorers:
  
  
  
  • Pick active providers with status pages and SLAs if this touches production. Examples many teams use: Coin Metrics (community endpoints), Kaiko, CryptoCompare, and on-chain explorers like mempool.space (BTC) or Etherscan (ETH).
  
  
  • If you’re building internal dashboards or doing research, free tiers can work. If you’re publishing externally (investor letters, NAVs, regulated disclosures), use licensed, auditable data.
  
  
  
  

Two practical examples I see all the time:

• Asset manager publishing weekly NAV: license a benchmark index from CoinDesk Indices, get end-of-day files with clear timestamps, change logs, and support contacts. That keeps auditors happy.


• Hackathon or proof-of-concept: use a free-tier API for prices and a public explorer for transaction lookups. Add a clear upgrade path in your docs so switching to a paid feed later is painless.

Support and documentation

• Legacy TradeBlock: don’t expect responses. Treat remaining pages as historical references only.


• Index questions now: go to CoinDesk Indices and use their contact routes for licensing, technical specs, and methodology documents.


• Before you sign: request written SLAs, uptime targets, incident comms process, and a test feed. Also ask for redundancy options (e.g., secondary endpoints or a market data vendor as a failover).

Is TradeBlock legit and safe?

Historically, yes—highly respected. But the platform shutdown changed the risk profile. Here’s how I keep readers from getting burned by “zombie” endpoints:

• Never hardcode legacy URLs from the old TradeBlock stack in production. If you inherit code that does, replace it immediately.


• Add health checks and fallbacks: validate prices against a secondary source, alert on stale timestamps, and set strict timeouts/retries.


• Document your source of truth: for anything audited or investor-facing, list the licensed provider, the index family, and the methodology version.

Nothing hurts more than opening your dashboard at 8 a.m. and seeing “N/A” because an old endpoint quietly stopped updating overnight. That’s preventable with the right vendor and a simple failover plan.

So if you can’t rely on the old setup, which alternatives are actually worth your time—and your budget—right now? I’ll break down the pros, cons, and the best picks next, including when to choose a benchmark index vs. a market data feed, and which explorers won’t let you down under heavy load.

Pros, cons, and the best current alternatives

Here’s the honest take: the TradeBlock name still carries weight, but in 2025 you need live, supported tools. Below I’ll call out what was great about TradeBlock, what trips people up today, and exactly where to go based on what you were trying to do—benchmark pricing, block lookups, or institutional execution.

Pros (historical)

• Benchmark-grade index methodology: The XBX lineage set a high bar for transparency and exchange inclusion rules, which helped shape how crypto benchmarks are run today.


• Clean, practical explorer UX: The old Bitcoin mempool and block views were fast and easy to parse, great for fee checks and transaction timing.


• Institutional tooling that actually worked: Routing, analytics, and reporting were built for funds and desks that needed controls, not flashy charts.

Cons (today)

• Brand confusion: Indices live on elsewhere; the institutional platform shut down; legacy links appear to work sometimes and then stall out.


• APIs you can’t rely on: Old endpoints show up in forum posts and gists, but they’re not maintained—bad for production and audits.


• Time sink risk: Teams waste hours trying to revive legacy workflows instead of moving to supported services with SLAs.

If you needed indices like XBX

For benchmark-quality pricing and methodologies, your first stop is the group that carries that legacy forward. If you want broader market data or different flavors of indices, here are strong, actively supported options:

• CoinDesk Indices: Successor home for the XBX family and related benchmarks. Good fit if you need licensable benchmarks, daily NAVs, and institutional documentation.


• Coin Metrics: Deep reference rates plus on-chain network data. Great for research, backtesting, and compliance reporting where you want both price and network fundamentals in one place.


• Kaiko: Tick-level spot/derivatives data and reference rates across many venues. Useful for best-execution checks, market microstructure studies, and building internal pricing engines.


• CryptoCompare: Known for aggregated pricing (CCCAGG) and a wide set of market feeds. Handy for dashboard-ready pricing, quick prototyping, and coverage across long-tail assets.


• Glassnode: On-chain analytics and indicators trusted by research teams. Strong for investor behavior analysis, cycle heuristics, and smart overlays on price data.

Quick selector:

• Need licensable benchmarks and methodologies? Go with the current XBX home.


• Need pricing + on-chain in one stack? Coin Metrics or Glassnode.


• Need tick-level venue coverage and TCA inputs? Kaiko.


• Need fast, broad pricing for apps/dashboards? CryptoCompare.

If you needed a blockchain explorer

TradeBlock’s explorer was loved for its clarity, but you’ll want an active, well-supported tool now. These are battle-tested and widely used by pros and hobbyists alike:

• mempool.space (Bitcoin): Real-time mempool, miner policies, RBF/CPFP flags, fee bands. Perfect when the network is congested and you’re optimizing fees or checking if a transaction is realistically getting into the next block. Bonus: self-hosting option.


• Blockstream Explorer (Bitcoin + Liquid): Simple, reliable BTC lookups with Liquid Network support and Tor access. Great for privacy-conscious users and Liquid asset operations.


• Blockchair (multi-chain): Cross-chain search, filters, and CSV exports. Helpful for investigations, tax lots, and linking addresses/transactions across chains.


• Etherscan (Ethereum + Etherscan family): Contract verification, decoded inputs, labels, events, and APIs. If you’re working with EVM chains, this is the standard workflow (think Etherscan, BscScan, Polygonscan, etc.).


• Blockchain.com Explorer (Bitcoin): Straightforward BTC view and historical charts. Good for quick checks when you don’t need advanced filters.

Tip: For production systems, either self-host (where possible) or use a provider that offers rate limits you can live with and clear uptime guarantees. It saves you from 2 a.m. fire drills.

If you needed institutional trading or execution

The institutional platform under the TradeBlock brand is gone, so you’ll want an EMS/OMS, custody, and execution partner that fits your products and geography. Start with this short list and match to your compliance, custody, and connectivity needs:

• Coinbase Prime: Integrated custody, execution, and reporting with institutional onboarding. Good for funds, corporates, and RIAs that want a single stack and mature controls.


• FalconX: Agency execution, credit, and OTC with smart routing across venues. Works well for treasury desks and funds that need discreet block trades and post-trade support.


• Copper: Custody with ClearLoop settlement so you can trade on connected exchanges while assets remain in custody. Useful for exchange access without constant hot-wallet transfers.


• Talos: EMS/OMS that connects you to exchanges and liquidity providers, plus TCA and policy controls. Ideal for multi-venue execution teams standardizing workflows.


• Fireblocks: MPC custody with a large settlement network and granular policies. Strong if you need programmatic treasury, automated settlements, or institutional DeFi rails.

Selection checklist:

• Licensing, audits, and where they’re regulated


• Custody model (segregated, MPC, settlement networks)


• Connectivity (exchanges, OTC, DeFi, fiat ramps)


• API depth, reporting, and TCA


• Onboarding time, limits, and support hours

Migration tip: Make a short “feature parity” sheet from your old setup: custody, routing, reporting, fee model, data feeds. Run a two-week parallel test with your new provider, confirm fills and reports match expectations, and only then cut over. It’s boring—but it saves real money and compliance headaches.

Still unsure which path matches your stack—or wondering whether any TradeBlock APIs are secretly still worth using? I’ve answered those exact questions next with straight-to-the-point FAQs you can scan in under two minutes.

FAQ: clear answers to the questions people keep asking

I pulled the most common questions I get and answered them plainly. If you’re cleaning up old integrations or choosing tools today, this will save you a ton of time.

Is TradeBlock still active?

No. The institutional platform branded as TradeBlock was shut down in May 2023. What lives on is the index business—now operated as CoinDesk Indices (CDI).

Who owns TradeBlock or its assets now?

The index unit was acquired and rebranded by CoinDesk (part of Digital Currency Group). The institutional trading platform itself was closed. If you’re after XBX or other benchmarks, you’re looking for CoinDesk Indices, not TradeBlock.

Is there a TradeBlock API I can use?

Treat anything “tradeblock.com/api/…” as legacy. Expect 404s, stale data, or zero support. For current feeds:

• Indices: go to CoinDesk Indices for docs, licensing, and integration.


• Market data & on-chain: consider Coin Metrics, Kaiko, CryptoCompare, or Glassnode.

Quick tip: if your code references old TradeBlock endpoints for BTC reference rates, migrate to CDI or swap in a supported provider’s price index with a clear methodology.

Is TradeBlock a blockchain explorer?

It had a well-liked explorer, but you shouldn’t lean on it now. Use active options with real maintenance:

• mempool.space (BTC mempool, fee estimates, RBF status)


• Blockstream Explorer (BTC, Liquid)


• Blockchair (multi-chain search, CSV exports)


• Etherscan (Ethereum) and its network explorers (e.g., BscScan, Arbiscan)

These are widely used in production by wallets, miners, and research teams. For example, mempool.space publishes mempool backlog and feerate histograms in real time—handy when fees spike.

How is TradeBlock related to Coinbase?

They’re different companies. TradeBlock’s index unit became CoinDesk Indices. The institutional platform was closed by CoinDesk. If you need an institutional venue, Coinbase Prime is a current alternative (alongside others below).

What happened to the XBX Bitcoin index?

It continues under CoinDesk Indices. You’ll find methodology papers, governance, and feeds on the CDI site. CDI focuses on robust, rules-based construction and exchange vetting—key factors if you’re using it for benchmarks, fund NAVs, or audits.

What should I use instead of TradeBlock’s institutional tools?

Match the provider to what you actually need (execution, custody, connectivity, or all three):

• Coinbase Prime (execution + custody, broad market access)


• FalconX (liquidity, credit, analytics)


• Copper (custody/connectivity; segregated wallets, ClearLoop)


• Talos (execution management/connectivity across venues)


• Fireblocks (MPC custody, treasury ops, settlement network)

Reality check: institutional teams I speak with often pair an EMS/OMS (like Talos) with a custodian and a couple of liquidity sources. That mix keeps you flexible when spreads, credit, or venue quality change.

Can I still see historical charts or mempool snapshots that used to be on TradeBlock?

Sometimes you’ll spot archived pages, but they’re not reliable for production or research. For verifiable history:

• Glassnode Studio for on-chain time series


• Woobull for curated BTC charts


• Coin Metrics NDP for researcher-grade, well-documented datasets

Pro tip: if you cite charts in reports, use providers with transparent methodology pages so reviewers can confirm assumptions and data sources.

Is there any free way to approximate XBX for casual use?

Not exactly—XBX is a governed benchmark. For casual dashboards, many people use free endpoints from CryptoCompare, CoinGecko, or exchange-weighted averages. It’s fine for hobby projects, but don’t use that as a benchmark in audited products.

Are there risks in sticking with legacy TradeBlock links?

Yes. The two big ones are silent data staleness and sudden outages. I’ve seen teams discover broken references only during a market move—never fun. Swap to maintained feeds now and set up monitoring on your data jobs.

How do I pick the right data provider if I was using TradeBlock for both prices and on-chain metrics?

Split the problem:

• Benchmarks/NAVs: use CoinDesk Indices.


• Market trades/order books: consider Kaiko or Coin Metrics market data.


• On-chain metrics: Coin Metrics NDP or Glassnode.

Check three things: methodology docs, historical coverage (backfill quality), and support SLAs. Those matter more than a flashy chart.

What about compliance and audit trails if I migrate away from TradeBlock?

Pick providers that publish governance and methodology, and ask for historical corrections logs. For institutional execution, request venue-level fill reports and market data snapshots at time-of-trade. It makes audits easier and reduces disputes.

My take and next steps

If you landed here from old docs or bookmarks, the path is simple and fast:

• Benchmarks: move to CoinDesk Indices for XBX and related series.


• Exploring blocks/txs: switch to mempool.space, Blockstream, Blockchair, or Etherscan.


• Institutional workflows: shortlist Talos, Coinbase Prime, FalconX, Copper, or Fireblocks based on your custody/execution needs.


• Data due diligence: read the provider’s methodology, test their API limits, and set up monitoring on your ETL jobs.

I keep fresh, no-BS picks on Cryptolinks News. Bookmark this page—if anything meaningful changes with legacy endpoints or new CDI access paths, I’ll update the recommendations right away.