Crush The Street

Crush The Street YouTube Review Guide: Everything You Need to Know + FAQ

Ever click on a “Bitcoin set to explode” thumbnail, sit through 25 minutes, and leave with nothing you can actually use? If you’re sizing up Crush The Street for crypto and macro insights, you’re in the right place. I watched the channel so you don’t have to—and I’ll show you how to use it smartly without falling for hype.

YouTube’s problem: too much noise, not enough signal

YouTube finance can be a minefield. Loud thumbnails, sensational hooks, and conflicting calls fly around daily. One video says “rate cuts incoming,” the next warns “higher for longer.” Add precious metals vs. Bitcoin debates, and it’s easy to feel stuck.

Here’s what usually muddies the waters:

• Sensationalism beats nuance: The algorithm loves drama. Research on online information spread shows exaggerated claims often travel faster than measured analysis. See: Science (2018): The spread of true and false news online.


• Hidden incentives: Finance channels sometimes wrap sponsored talking points in “education.” Regulators have flagged this. The FCA found many young investors rely on finfluencers, often without understanding risks. Source: UK FCA Financial Lives. ESMA has also warned about finfluencer risks: ESMA TRV reports.


• Cherry-picked wins: Bold calls get replayed; misses get memory-holed. You’re left with survivorship bias and the illusion that “everyone called it.”


• Time sink with low ROI: A 40-minute interview might offer one good idea—if you can spot it and verify it. That’s a big “if.”

The result? You want signal, not noise—a channel that teaches you frameworks you can apply, not just another adrenaline spike.

What you’ll actually get here

I’m keeping this review practical and no-nonsense. You’ll get:

• What the channel really is and the lens it uses


• What you’ll learn (and what you won’t)


• How often they post and the production style


• How good the interviews are and where the biases live


• How to extract real value from their content without getting sold a story


• A quick FAQ that answers the questions people actually ask

By the end, you’ll know exactly how to use Crush The Street for crypto and macro context—without mistaking commentary for a trade alert.

Why you should trust this breakdown

I’ve tested a lot of finance and crypto channels and built a simple, repeatable way to separate useful content from noise. Here’s the checklist I use on every review:

• Content quality: Are there clear frameworks or just repeat talking points?


• Accuracy: Are claims sourced? Do predictions get revisited?


• Transparency: Are sponsors and promotions obvious?


• Frequency: Is the posting cadence steady and reliable?


• Production: Clean audio/video and minimal fluff?


• Bias check: What worldview shapes the content (gold, Bitcoin, fiat skepticism)?


• Actionability: Are there concrete takeaways you can test, not just vibes?


• Risk language: Is uncertainty acknowledged, or is it all certainty and moon talk?

My promise: straight talk, clear examples, and pointers you can use today—no hype, no vague platitudes.

Ready to see what the channel actually is, who’s behind it, and whether it fits your investing style? Let’s answer the biggest question first: what exactly is Crush The Street—and how does it approach crypto and macro?

What is Crush The Street? Channel snapshot

If your feed swings from doom to moon, this channel is the calm, macro-first middle ground. Crush The Street focuses on big-picture forces—monetary policy, inflation, commodities—and how they collide with Bitcoin and the wider crypto market. It’s built around interviews with voices who actually watch cycles and cash flows, not just ticker tape.

Who’s behind it

The face you’ll see most is Kenneth Ameduri, and the lens is clear: hard assets first with rising attention on Bitcoin’s place in a broken fiat world. Expect thoughtful questions, a respectful pro–precious metals bias, and a willingness to hear out credible crypto theses.

“Gold is money. Everything else is credit.” —J.P. Morgan

That line could sit above the channel’s banner—just add Bitcoin to the conversation and you’ve got the vibe. If you’re drawn to sound money narratives but want them pressure-tested against today’s data, you’ll feel at home.

What they publish

Most uploads are interview-driven or host commentary that center on market structure, not meme cycles. Typical themes you’ll see on thumbnails and titles:

• Inflation and rate paths: What a pause or cut does to gold, silver, and BTC.


• Mining economics: AISC, capex cycles, and why silver producers can torque harder late in a bull market.


• Bitcoin cycle checkpoints: Halving, issuance math, and how liquidity steers returns.


• Hedging and allocation: Blending metals with crypto in a way that won’t nuke your risk budget.


• Commodities spillovers: Energy shocks and their knock-on effects for risk assets, including crypto.

Some episodes nod to a related site or newsletter. That’s normal for finance YouTube; the value still lives in the interviews when guests bring fresh data to the table.

Why this mix works: gold and Bitcoin sit on different but overlapping playfields. Research like Erb & Harvey’s work on gold shows its inflation linkage is real but lumpy across time, while the IMF has shown crypto increasingly moves in sync with equities—i.e., with risk-on liquidity. A channel that cross-examines metals and BTC under changing macro regimes helps you think in scenarios, not slogans.

• Erb & Harvey (SSRN): The Golden Dilemma


• IMF: Crypto prices now move more in sync with stocks

Posting frequency and style

Uploads come in steady spurts, not daily drops. Think weekly-to-monthly depending on market heat and guest availability. Production is clean and podcast-like: remote interviews, clear audio, minimal fluff. No chart spam or gimmicks—just a guest, a thesis, and time to unpack it.

I actually like that slower cadence. It gives you time to test a framework against your own strategy instead of chasing whatever screamed the loudest today.

Want to know which types of episodes consistently deliver “aha” moments—and how to turn them into practical moves without gambling? Keep reading; the next part is where I break down exactly what you’ll learn and how to use it without falling for shiny narratives.

The content: what you’ll actually learn

If you’re tired of hot takes and want practical frameworks, this is where the channel earns its keep. It treats crypto as part of the bigger macro machine—rates, liquidity, debt, and commodity cycles—so you learn why Bitcoin runs when it runs, stalls when it stalls, and how metals fit into the picture.

“Frameworks beat forecasts. Every time.”

Expect real discussions about how inflation trends, rate cuts, and liquidity pivots can set the stage for crypto—and why gold and silver still matter if you’re thinking in terms of resilience and optionality.

Precious metals meets crypto

Think of this as a cross-asset conversation. You’ll see how gold, silver, and Bitcoin can coexist inside the same portfolio without stepping on each other’s toes.

• Hedge layering: Gold is often framed as the slow, steady ballast; Bitcoin as the high-volatility upside. Research like Erb & Harvey’s “The Golden Dilemma” (SSRN) shows gold’s inflation hedge works better over long spans than short bursts. Pair that with Bitcoin’s liquidity sensitivity, and you’ve got complementary traits rather than substitutes.


• Macro playbook moments: Episodes often ask: what happens around the Fed’s “pause” or first cut? Historically, risk assets (including BTC) have responded to easing and balance sheet growth; gold tends to anticipate policy weakness during late-cycle jitters. You’ll see how to map those moments to positioning, not predictions.


• Correlation reality checks: It isn’t dogma. The channel acknowledges times when Bitcoin tracked equities closely—something the IMF flagged in 2022 (IMF). That nuance matters if you’re relying on BTC as a crisis hedge in the short term.

Bottom line: you’ll learn when metals can carry the defensive baton and when Bitcoin can capitalize on liquidity tailwinds—without pretending either one is magic.

Interviews: the real value

The strongest episodes bring in operators and allocators who speak in data, not slogans. You’ll hear guests break down:

• Liquidity gauges: How M2 growth, the dollar index (DXY), and the pace of quantitative tightening/expansion ripple through crypto. Quick self-checks you’ll see referenced: FRED M2, CME FedWatch, and CPI trends via FRED CPI.


• On-chain and mining realities: Miner breakevens, hashprice compression/expansion (see public dashboards like Hashrate Index), and what that signals for Bitcoin’s reflexive cycles.


• Cross-asset signals: When gold’s relative strength hints at late-cycle stress, how yield curve dynamics affect risk appetite, and why that can front-run rotations into or out of crypto.

The magic isn’t a “pick.” It’s the habit of turning a guest’s thesis into a testable checklist you can run monthly.

Actionability and signal-to-noise

This isn’t a “buy this alt now” channel. It’s closer to a macro lab where you turn ideas into guardrails. Here’s how I turn the content into action without chasing headlines:

• Translate narratives into triggers: “If DXY weakens and the market prices earlier cuts on CME FedWatch, I tilt risk-on.” That’s a condition, not a prediction.


• Create 2–3 repeatable checks per episode: For example:
  
  
  
  • Is liquidity expanding or contracting? (M2, central bank balance sheets, credit spreads)
  
  
  • Is Bitcoin acting like high-beta tech or like a macro hedge this month? (Check BTC vs. Nasdaq correlation)
  
  
  • Are miners capitulating or recovering? (Hashprice trend, difficulty adjustments)
  
  
  
  


• Map insights to your rulebook: Long-term allocator? Use macro signals to tweak rebalance bands or hedge sizes. Active trader? Let macro lean inform bias, not entries—your system still handles timing.

That approach keeps the episodes high-signal: strong frameworks, low hype. It also lines up with what we’ve seen in the data—short-term BTC often trades like a risk asset, while metals can steady the ship; longer-term, regime shifts and liquidity can flip the script.

Who it’s best for

• Macro-curious crypto investors who want to stop guessing and start using liquidity, rates, and growth as their north star.


• Metal bulls who are open to Bitcoin but want to keep a solid hard-asset core.


• Long-form learners who prefer interviews, frameworks, and real-world operators over flashy charts and price calls.

If you’re nodding along, the next obvious question is: can you trust the messenger? Are there biases, sponsors, or track record quirks you should know about before you commit your attention? Keep reading—I’m about to pull that curtain back.

Credibility, transparency, and track record

I ran a credibility stress test on this channel: looking for disclosures, sponsor mentions, and whether the tone matches the thumbnails. Big picture: it presents itself as educational and generally behaves that way. You will hear sponsor reads and see links to newsletters or partners—that’s normal in finance media, but it’s still your cue to keep your guard up.

“In markets, conviction without verification is just hope.”

A quick reminder from the rulebook: the FTC endorsement guides say sponsor relationships must be clear and hard to miss. YouTube even has an “Includes paid promotion” flag. Good channels use both. Disclosures don’t make content bad—they make it honest. Just remember, research shows disclosures reduce but don’t remove persuasion effects, especially in finance conversations (see influencer advertising research like Boerman et al., Journal of Advertising, 2017).

Who’s talking and why it matters

Kenneth Ameduri’s lens is macro + hard assets. Expect recurring themes: monetary debasement risk, gold/silver as hedges, Bitcoin as “digital sound money,” and policy-driven liquidity cycles. That lens is useful—so long as you know you’re looking through it.

• What that looks like in practice: interviews that map rate cuts, CPI trends, or debt dynamics to expected outcomes for gold and Bitcoin.


• Where that helps: it keeps you alert to tail risks and the “why” behind big crypto moves.


• Where it can mislead: if every narrative points to “own more hard assets,” you might underweight other valid opportunities.

If you can spot the lens, you can counterbalance it. That’s how you learn without getting boxed in.

Wins and misses

• Wins:
  
  
  
  • Long-horizon frameworks age better than hot takes. When guests tie Bitcoin and metals to liquidity cycles or real yields, you get a map—not a timestamped bet. In 2022’s tightening, that framework helped explain risk pressure; in 2023–2024, easier liquidity aligned with renewed crypto strength. Frameworks, not forecasts.
  
  
  • Interviews > monologues. The better episodes bring on fund managers, commodity analysts, or builders who back claims with data or firsthand context.
  
  
  
  


• Misses:
  
  
  
  • Price targets don’t travel well. Whenever any finance channel leans into near-term targets, the shelf life shrinks fast. I treat those as sentiment markers, not signals.
  
  
  • Metals-first bias can crowd the frame. A gold-centric worldview may understate innovation or adoption drivers in crypto that aren’t strictly macro (e.g., L2 progress, stablecoin velocity, or developer activity).
  
  
  
  

None of that is unique to this channel. It’s the nature of market talk: strong on narrative, variable on timing. Your edge is in separating evergreen frameworks from expiring opinions.

Bias watch

I track a few steady tilts while I watch:

• Hard-asset preference: gold and silver get the benefit of the doubt; Bitcoin fits as “digital gold.” Altcoins rarely get the same airtime unless they serve the hedge story.


• Fiat skepticism: policy error, debt spirals, and inflation as core risks. Useful perspective—just remember confirmation bias is a thing (we all favor evidence that fits our beliefs).


• Newsletter/sponsor gravity: occasional episodes support partner products or lists. That doesn’t invalidate the content, but it can steer topic selection.

One practical fix: I keep a “base-rate” note next to any bold claim (e.g., how often similar macro setups actually led to the outcome predicted). It’s amazing how a simple base-rate check keeps you objective.

My red-flag check

Here’s what I specifically looked for—and what I found:

• Wild guarantees or “can’t lose” language? I didn’t see that. Thumbnails can be urgent, but the interviews are usually measured.


• Opaque pay-to-play? Sponsor reads and promotions were present and identifiable. Keep an eye on video descriptions and pinned comments—standard places for links.


• Time-stamped accountability? Like most interview channels, there isn’t a running scorecard of past calls. That’s on us: screenshot or note claims you care about and revisit later.


• Pressure tactics? I avoid anything pushing “limited time” or “urgent secret picks.” I didn’t encounter hard-sell scripts here, but that’s a universal red flag across YouTube.

Regulators are watching this space for a reason. The SEC’s actions on undisclosed crypto promos and the UK FCA’s guidance on finfluencers show the bar is rising. Clear disclosures and sober interviews are positive signs; your job is to cross-check bold claims before you let them shape your allocation.

Want the exact playbook I use to turn a 45-minute interview into two or three testable, bias-proof steps? Stick with me—next, I’ll show you how to watch smarter so you get context without the noise.

How to get real value from the channel

Think of Crush The Street as your macro compass. It’s not a “buy this now” signal—it’s the fuel for smarter decisions. I use it to spot the big winds (liquidity, real yields, dollar strength, credit stress), then I check the numbers before touching my allocation.

“In markets, you’re paid for patience, not clicks.”

Watch smarter

Here’s the simple playbook I use so each video gives me something I can actually test:

• Skim the title and guest. Ask: what’s the single macro claim here? Rate cuts coming? Dollar topping? Gold and Bitcoin can run together?


• Jump to the thesis. Use timestamps or scrub the waveform until you hear the guest’s core point. Don’t watch end-to-end; be surgical.


• Write 2–3 testable lines. For example: “If real yields drop, Bitcoin and gold should catch a bid.”


• Cross-check with public data:
  
  
  
  • Real yields: FRED 10y TIPS real yield (DFII10)
  
  
  • Dollar strength: DXY on TradingView (ticker: DXY)
  
  
  • Inflation/claims: CPI and jobless claims at FRED
  
  
  • On-chain health: MVRV and HODL metrics via Glassnode Academy (MVRV)
  
  
  • Stablecoin firepower: Stablecoin Supply Ratio (SSR) basics (SSR)
  
  
  
  

Why this setup works: research from the IMF has shown crypto increasingly moving in sync with broader risk assets during 2020–2022, which means macro talk isn’t just noise—it often shows up in prices. See their overview here: IMF on rising correlations.

Pair it with your strategy

The same video can mean different things depending on your playbook. Two quick paths:

If you’re a long-term allocator

• Keep it boring and powerful: Stick to a DCA schedule for BTC/ETH. Use the channel’s macro context to adjust within pre-set bands (example: 55–65% crypto core).


• Rebalancing trigger idea: If real yields trend down and USD weakens for 4–6 weeks, you can tilt a few percent toward BTC within your range. If real yields spike and financial conditions tighten, rotate that few percent back into cash or gold—no hero moves.


• Hedge like an adult: Hard-asset guests often make a solid case for some gold. If it fits your beliefs and timeframe, consider a small allocation as a volatility buffer. Keep rules simple and written.

If you’re more active

• Treat narratives as scenarios, not entries: “If the guest’s rate-cut view plays out and DXY rolls over, I’ll look for BTC strength vs. alts first.” Then wait for your system (market breadth, funding, open interest, liquidity depth) to confirm.


• Map it to risk: If funding flips positive and open interest rises into resistance, the macro idea might be right but the timing crowded—size smaller.


• Run post-mortems: Were you early, late, or just wrong on the thesis? Keep a one-line log; it compounds your edge faster than any “hot take.”

Two real-world checklists I actually use

When a guest says “falling real yields are bullish for Bitcoin and gold”

• Confirm 10y real yield is trending down (DFII10 making lower highs)


• Check DXY rolling over while S&P breadth improves (more stocks above 50DMA)


• Look for BTC higher lows on rising spot volume; MVRV not screaming euphoria


• If yes to 2 of 3, I’ll allow a small tilt toward BTC; otherwise I wait

When someone teases “altcoin season soon”

• BTC dominance (BTC.D) falling while total crypto ex-BTC/ETH (TOTAL3) breaks out?


• On-chain fees and real usage improving on target networks (not just price)


• Liquidity decent: spreads tight, depth not drying up during pumps


• If usage is flat and dominance drop is just churn, I pass—no FOMO allowed

Risk and reality check

• Nothing here is financial advice. Markets move fast, and guests can be brilliant and still be wrong.


• Use the “3-I test” on every bold claim: Idea, Information, Incentive.
  
  
  
  • Idea: What exactly is being predicted?
  
  
  • Information: What evidence backs it?
  
  
  • Incentive: Is there a book, fund, or product angle?
  
  
  
  


• Two-source rule: Don’t act until you’ve confirmed the thesis with at least two independent datasets (macro + on-chain, or macro + market structure).


• Cooling-off rule: No trades on the same day you watch a punchy interview. Sleep on it. If it’s real, it’ll still be there tomorrow.

Who should probably skip

If you want daily altcoin picks, hour-by-hour headlines, or scalp entries, this isn’t your feed. It shines when you care about cycles, hedges, and “how to think” frameworks.

Want a quick scorecard and a starter playlist that match this way of watching? I’ve got you—coming up next.

My quick scorecard and starter plan

Scorecard (high‑level)

If you want the fastest path to value, here’s how I rate the channel for crypto investors who care about macro context and interviews:

• Content quality: Strong for frameworks and guest-led insights. Expect discussions around liquidity, real yields, and policy cycles you can map to Bitcoin, gold, and risk assets. Example: the better interviews unpack how the dollar (DXY) and global liquidity align with BTC bull/bear phases—something multiple on-chain and macro notes (think Glassnode and Coin Metrics research) have echoed over the last few years.


• Accuracy: Mixed—like any interview hub. Big-picture theses (e.g., liquidity matters more than narratives) age better than timing calls. Pro tip: when a guest gives a date, I treat it as a scenario to track, not a forecast to obey.


• Transparency: Generally standard. Sponsors and newsletters pop up at times—normal for finance content, but keep your “why are they saying this?” filter on.


• Frequency: Moderate. Not a news feed; it’s a steady stream of interviews that compound well if you’re building a macro lens.


• Production: Clean and watchable. Audio usually clear; remote guest quality varies but doesn’t block learning.

Starter playlist idea

Use this three-video sprint to get the worldview fast without falling into a binge hole. Go to the channel’s page and use the search bar to find these themes: Crush The Street on YouTube.

• 1) Macro overview interview
  Search cues: “macro,” “liquidity,” “rate cuts,” “recession risk.”
  What to listen for: mentions of dollar strength (DXY), yield curve (2s/10s), policy expectations, and global liquidity (central bank balance sheets).
  Why it matters: Research across the space has shown that Bitcoin tends to track broad liquidity trends—2020–2021 is the textbook example, while 2022 showed the flip side when liquidity drained and correlations with equities rose.


• 2) Bitcoin cycle guest
  Search cues: “Bitcoin cycle,” “halving,” “ETF flows,” “on-chain.”
  What to listen for: halving narratives, realized price talk, distribution vs. accumulation, and how liquidity or real yields tie into crypto risk appetite.
  Why it matters: Pairing halving chatter with data (realized cap, MVRV, ETF net flows) keeps you from treating a calendar event like a guarantee.


• 3) Precious metals and hard assets
  Search cues: “gold,” “silver,” “real yields,” “mining.”
  What to listen for: gold/Bitcoin “sound money” arguments, 10-year TIPS (real yield) as a driver, and the gold-to-BTC lens for cross-asset positioning.
  Why it matters: When real yields rise, gold often struggles; when they fall, gold usually breathes. Seeing how guests connect this to Bitcoin helps you think in cross-asset terms rather than in a crypto silo.

Bonus tip: scrub through chapters and jump straight to segments labeled “liquidity,” “policy,” “Bitcoin cycle,” and “real yields.” You’ll get 80% of the value in 20% of the time.

How I verify claims

Rule of thumb: harvest frameworks, not picks. Then pressure‑test the thesis with data.

• On‑chain checks
  - Realized cap and MVRV to see if we’re stretched or still in value territory.
  - Supply last active (1y+, 2y+) to gauge holder conviction and potential sell pressure.
  - Stablecoin supply trends and the Stablecoin Supply Ratio (SSR) for dry powder hints.
  - Open interest, funding rates, and perps basis to spot leverage froth or stress.


• Macro and policy
  - CPI and PCE prints (BLS/BEA) and the trend in sticky vs. headline inflation.
  - Fed path via CME FedWatch; 2s/10s curve shape; DXY trend; VIX regime.
  - Liquidity proxies: Fed balance sheet, TGA, and RRP; G5 central bank assets as a rough global gauge. Bitcoin has historically responded to these tides—liquidity up, risk assets breathe; liquidity down, they wheeze.


• Precious metals context
  - 10y TIPS (real yields) vs. gold; COT reports for positioning; ETF flows (GLD/SLV).
  - Gold/BTC ratio for cross-asset sanity checks; if gold rips on falling real yields, ask whether BTC’s move aligns with that macro impulse or something purely crypto-native.


• Market structure sanity checks
  - 90‑day BTC–S&P correlation to understand whether macro risk dominates.
  - Credit risk via HYG/LQD, and breadth in equities to see if risk appetite is broad or narrow.
  - Big event days (CPI, FOMC) often bring outsized crypto volatility—if a thesis ignores that, I wait.


• The pre‑action checklist
  - Is the thesis falsifiable (what would prove it wrong)?
  - What’s the time horizon (weeks, months, cycle)?
  - Does it align with my risk limits and position sizing?
  - Have I checked at least one independent analyst or dataset (e.g., FRED, Glassnode, Coin Metrics)?

Want straight, no-fluff answers to the questions everyone asks about this channel—legit or not, sponsor bias, and whether beginners should watch? I’ll tackle those head‑on next. What’s the one thing you wish someone told you before you hit “Subscribe” on a finance channel?

FAQ: Straight answers and my final take

Is Crush The Street legit?

Yes—legit as an educational channel. It’s focused on macro, hard assets, and crypto’s role in that picture. Treat it like a source of viewpoints and frameworks, not signals. Any bold call you hear, verify before you act. I’ve found the interviews generally measured, with fewer “moon today” claims than most of YouTube.

Who runs it and what’s their angle?

It’s associated with Kenneth Ameduri. The lens is clear: gold/silver, macro cycles, Bitcoin as sound money, and skepticism toward fiat. If your feed is all “crypto-only,” this angle can balance you. Just remember: every lens comes with bias. That’s not a bug; it’s a feature you should account for.

How often do they post?

Uploads are periodic, not daily. Think steady interviews and commentary. It’s good for people who want substance more than frequency.

Do they promote products or sponsors?

Sometimes, yes—common across finance YouTube. Watch for sponsor mentions and newsletter tie-ins. That doesn’t invalidate an interview, it just means you should keep your guard up. For context, the SEC has warned that media and newsletters can be paid to feature companies. Always separate the idea from the incentive.

Is it good for beginners?

Good for beginners who like long-form conversations and big-picture thinking. If you’re totally new, pair it with basic primers so the macro terms don’t fly by. Free, credible resources help a lot, like the FINRA Foundation’s research on financial capability or the CFTC’s consumer education hub Learn & Protect.

What’s the best way to use the channel?

Harvest frameworks, not coin picks. Here’s a simple way to squeeze real value out of a single interview:

• Write the guest’s thesis in one sentence. Example: “If real yields soften and liquidity returns, gold and Bitcoin should outperform over 12–24 months.”


• Pull 2–3 checkable datapoints. For this example: real yields (TIPs vs. nominal), liquidity proxies (Fed balance sheet, TGA), and Bitcoin supply dynamics.


• Cross-check with public data: FRED for real yields and CPI, CME FedWatch for rate odds, Blockchain.com charts for basic on-chain activity.


• Decide how it fits your rules. If you DCA, maybe you just rebalance on schedule. If you’re active, set risk-defined entries and stops—don’t wing it.

Why this works: acting on narratives alone is dangerous. Research shows frequent trading hurts returns (see Barber & Odean, “Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth,” Journal of Finance). Framework first, data second, execution last.

Any alternatives if I want a different style?

Mix formats so your inputs aren’t all interviews:

• Data-heavy/on-chain dashboards: great for validating narratives with numbers (supply, activity, fees). Even the free tiers or public charts can get you 80% there.


• Macro data at the source: FRED, BLS, BEA, and the CME FedWatch tool help you sanity-check claims about rates, inflation, and liquidity.


• Performance reality-checks: The SPIVA scorecards from S&P show how often active managers lag benchmarks. Useful context when you hear aggressive market-timing takes.


• News digests: Short, daily recaps (newsletter or audio) keep you current without marathon viewing sessions.

Bottom line

Crush The Street is a solid macro-oriented channel that treats Bitcoin and precious metals as hedges within the bigger economic story. Use it to sharpen your thinking, not to chase trades. Note the thesis, check the data, and fit everything into your own risk rules. Do that, and your YouTube time turns into real investing value.


CryptoLinks.com does not endorse, promote, or associate with youtube channels that offer or imply unrealistic returns through potentially unethical practices. Our mission remains to guide the community toward safe, informed, and ethical participation in the cryptocurrency space. We urge our readers and the wider crypto community to remain vigilant, to conduct thorough research, and to always consider the broader implications of their investment choices.