Capricorn APR Jumps After 5.3% Investor Repurchase: Why the 52.8M Unlock Math Matters

aPriori is now Capricorn, and the newly rebranded Monad infrastructure project says it has repurchased 5.3% of APR’s total supply from early investors. The tokens are being redirected toward community incentives and ecosystem expansion rather than being announced as burned, making the revised October unlock schedule much more important than the word “buyback.”

Capricorn, previously known as aPriori, has announced an investor repurchase covering 5.3% of APR’s 1 billion-token supply. The number I would focus on first is 52.8 million APR: that is exactly 33% of the original 160 million-token Early Backer allocation, and it equals 5.28% of APR’s total supply.

That mathematical match strongly suggests the restructuring is connected to the first major Early Backer cliff originally scheduled around the one-year anniversary of APR’s October 23, 2025 token generation event. But there is an equally important distinction: Capricorn has not announced that these tokens are being burned.

As of our August 13, 2026 market-data snapshot, CoinMarketCap showed APR near $0.484, up about 34.8% over 24 hours, with approximately $122 million in 24-hour volume. Its circulating market capitalization was around $134.4 million, compared with a fully diluted valuation of roughly $483.8 million.

The central question is therefore not simply whether Capricorn “bought back 5.3% of supply.” It is this:

Did Capricorn make APR meaningfully scarcer in the near term, or did it mainly replace a large investor unlock with a different future distribution mechanism?

Key takeaways

• Capricorn says it repurchased 5.3% of total APR supply from early investors.
• The original Early Backer allocation was 160 million APR, with 33% scheduled to release after a 12-month cliff. That first tranche equals 52.8 million APR, or 5.28% of total supply.
• This is not an announced token burn. APR’s total and maximum supply remain 1 billion tokens in current market-data sources.
• Tokenomics.com now separates the old investor allocation into 10.7% Early Backers and 5.3% “Investors Repurchase.”
• The exact vesting schedule for the repurchased 5.3% remains publicly unresolved, which prevents a definitive calculation of the revised October unlock.
• APR’s price and volume increased sharply around the announcement period, but derivatives activity was enormous relative to tracked spot volume.
• Even after the restructuring, only about 27.8% of APR’s maximum supply is currently circulating, so longer-term dilution remains important.

aPriori is now Capricorn—but APR remains the token

The investor repurchase arrived shortly after a broader change in project identity.

On July 29, 2026, aPriori announced that it was becoming Capricorn following its acquisition of CapricornDEX. The project’s announcement was unusually clear on two points: existing products would remain live and “$APR stays $APR.”

That matters because rebrands in crypto can create an immediate security problem. Scammers often exploit a name change to promote fake token migrations, fake contract upgrades or entirely unrelated tokens carrying a similar name.

Based on the official rebrand communication reviewed for this article, Capricorn did not announce a replacement token that APR holders must swap into. The current CoinMarketCap page has also been renamed Capricorn while continuing to track the APR ticker and existing supply.

Security warning: CoinMarketCap currently identifies the APR Ethereum contract as:

0x5A9610919f5e81183823A2be4Bd1BeB2B4da2a20

The Capricorn rebrand does not mean that an unrelated cryptocurrency using CAP, CAPRICORN or similar branding is the project’s new token. Readers should verify the full contract and network through official Capricorn documentation before interacting with APR.

This is exactly the type of situation where our CryptoLinks guide on how to participate in crypto airdrops safely is useful: fake migrations, fake claims and wallet-draining rebrand sites often rely on users trusting a name or logo instead of verifying the contract.

What Capricorn actually announced

On August 12, 2026, Capricorn said it had repurchased 5.3% of total APR supply from early investors and that the acquired tokens would be redirected toward community incentives and ecosystem expansion.

I would describe this transaction as an investor repurchase or secondary repurchase, rather than automatically calling it an open-market buyback.

There is no indication in the announcement that Capricorn entered public exchanges and bought 5.3% of APR from ordinary spot-market sellers. Instead, the identified source of the tokens is early investors.

That difference matters.

With an open-market buyback, I would primarily ask how much market liquidity was absorbed and where the purchased tokens ended up. With a private investor repurchase, I want to know the purchase price, which investors participated, whether their vesting agreements changed, what funded the transaction and what new restrictions apply to the acquired allocation.

Repurchase question	Current status
5.3% of supply announced?	Yes
Tokens acquired from early investors?	Yes
Exact purchase price disclosed?	No
Dollar consideration disclosed?	No
Funding source disclosed?	No
Participating investors identified?	No
Settlement wallet/transaction identified?	Not in the public announcement reviewed
Tokens announced as burned?	No
Community/ecosystem destination announced?	Yes
Exact destination split disclosed?	No
New vesting schedule disclosed?	Not yet established in the sources reviewed

Why the 5.3% figure is more important than it looks

The original aPriori tokenomics allocated 16% of APR to Early Backers.

With a total supply of 1 billion APR:

1,000,000,000 × 16% = 160,000,000 APR

The original Early Backer vesting schedule specified a 12-month cliff, with 33% released after 12 months and the remaining 67% vesting quarterly over the following 24 months.

So the first investor release was:

160,000,000 × 33% = 52,800,000 APR

And relative to the total token supply:

52,800,000 ÷ 1,000,000,000 = 5.28%

Rounded to one decimal place:

5.28% ≈ 5.3%

What stands out to me is how closely Capricorn’s repurchase percentage matches the original first investor cliff. This is why the number is more meaningful than a generic “5.3% buyback” headline suggests.

The strongest interpretation is that the restructuring is directly connected to the investor tranche that had been scheduled to become available after the one-year cliff.

But that interpretation still needs one important qualification: Capricorn’s public announcement uses the 5.3% figure, while the exact amended vesting treatment of that allocation has not been fully published.

APR tokenomics before and after the announcement

The original token distribution looked like this:

Allocation	Original share	Original tokens	Current Tokenomics.com classification
Community Incentives	22%	220M APR	22%
Ecosystem Growth	17%	170M APR	17%
Core Contributors	16%	160M APR	16%
Foundation	16%	160M APR	16%
Early Backers	16%	160M APR	10.7%
Investors Repurchase	—	—	5.3%
Genesis Airdrop	12%	120M APR	12%
Liquidity & Market Stability	1%	10M APR	1%
Total	100%	1B APR	100%

This table illustrates something that can easily disappear in bullish social-media summaries: the 5.3% has not vanished from the tokenomics.

Tokenomics.com currently shows it as a separate “Investors Repurchase” allocation, while the Early Backer category falls from 16% to 10.7%. The provider currently lists no vesting information for the new repurchase bucket.

Capricorn says those tokens will ultimately support community incentives and ecosystem expansion, but I would not increase the Community Incentives or Ecosystem Growth percentages in a revised allocation table until the project publishes the exact split.

This is an investor repurchase, not necessarily a token burn

This distinction deserves to be explicit because crypto uses the word “buyback” for several economically different mechanisms.

Mechanism	Total supply effect	Immediate float effect	Future supply effect
Token burn	Permanently decreases	Usually decreases	Permanently lower
Open-market buyback + hold	Unchanged	May reduce liquid float	Tokens can return
Investor repurchase + treasury hold	Unchanged	Can prevent an expected investor release	Depends on treasury policy
Repurchase + community redistribution	Unchanged	Can remove or delay an investor cliff	Future incentive emissions remain possible
Vesting extension	Unchanged	Delays circulation	Tokens enter later

The fourth row is currently the closest description of Capricorn’s announced plan.

For comparison, our CryptoLinks analysis of token buybacks versus an actual token burn explains why what happens after tokens are repurchased determines the long-term supply effect.

CoinMarketCap currently reports both APR’s total supply and maximum supply at 1 billion tokens. Nothing in Capricorn’s announcement establishes a permanent 5.3% reduction in that figure.

I therefore would not describe APR as deflationary because of this transaction.

What happens to the October 2026 unlock now?

This is the section of the story that matters most for holders.

Under the original tokenomics, the first Early Backer cliff was approximately 52.8M APR. Core Contributors were separately scheduled to receive 25% of their 160M allocation after a 12-month cliff, equal to another 40M APR.

The original quarterly schedules for Community Incentives, Ecosystem Growth and the Foundation add approximately another 30.94M APR around the same quarterly cycle.

That gives an original reconstructed October release of approximately:

123.74 million APR

Current circulating supply is approximately 277.81 million APR.

That means the originally reconstructed October event was equivalent to approximately:

123.74M ÷ 277.81M = 44.54% of today’s circulating supply

That is why changing even one major component of the event matters.

Scenario 1: the entire original 52.8M investor cliff is removed

If Capricorn’s repurchase completely replaces the original first investor release and none of those acquired tokens re-enter circulation in October, the known reconstructed October issuance would fall from approximately 123.74M to:

70.94M APR

That is about 25.53% of today’s circulating supply and represents a roughly 42.7% reduction in the originally reconstructed October event.

That would be a materially different near-term supply profile.

Scenario 2: the remaining 10.7% investor pool keeps its original cliff

There is another possible interpretation.

Tokenomics.com currently shows Early Backers at 10.7% of supply while continuing to display the old Early Backer terms: a 12-month cliff followed by 33% at month 12.

Ten-point-seven percent of the 1 billion supply is 107M APR. Thirty-three percent of that is:

107M × 33% = 35.31M APR

Under that interpretation, the reconstructed October event becomes at least:

70.94M + 35.31M = 106.25M APR

That equals approximately 38.24% of today’s circulating supply—before accounting for any separate emissions from the repurchased 5.3% bucket.

October 2026 scenario	Reconstructed release	% of current circulating supply
Original schedule	123.74M APR	44.54%
Full first investor cliff removed	70.94M APR	25.53%
Remaining 10.7% investor pool retains old cliff	106.25M APR + any repurchase emissions	38.24%+

This is the biggest unresolved tokenomics question.

Until Capricorn publishes the amended vesting schedule, I would not state as fact that all 52.8M APR originally due to Early Backers in October has been permanently removed from that date.

Where will the repurchased APR go?

Capricorn says the acquired tokens will be redirected toward community incentives and ecosystem expansion.

That is potentially constructive because it shifts economic ownership away from private investors and toward users, builders, liquidity programs, staking participants, grants or other ecosystem initiatives.

But “community” does not automatically mean “non-selling supply.”

If users receive transferable APR rewards, some will hold them and some will sell them. If the tokens are distributed through aggressive liquidity mining, activity can rise while incentives are available and disappear when rewards end.

Our CryptoLinks guide to DeFi explains why liquidity incentives and yield farming can create impressive headline activity without guaranteeing sticky long-term users.

The quality of Capricorn’s new allocation will therefore depend on details that have not yet been fully disclosed:

• the exact split between Community Incentives and Ecosystem Growth;
• the distribution period;
• whether rewards vest;
• who can receive them;
• how Sybil resistance is handled;
• whether recipients must use Capricorn products;
• whether governance controls deployment;
• and whether destination wallets and emissions are reported publicly.

Moving APR from investors to users changes ownership. The new vesting schedule tells us whether it also changes dilution.

How much did Capricorn pay early investors?

That figure has not been publicly disclosed in the announcement reviewed.

This means it would be misleading to multiply 52.8M APR by today’s market price and present the result as “the cost of the buyback.”

At a token price around $0.484, 52.8M APR has a marked market value of roughly $25.5 million. That does not mean Capricorn paid $25.5 million to investors.

The purchase may have occurred at another negotiated price, valuation or settlement structure.

Tokenomics.com currently lists an Early Backer entry price of approximately $0.018692 per APR. At that historical price, the original notional acquisition cost of 52.8M APR would have been approximately $987,000.

Again, that does not establish investor profit from the repurchase because the actual repurchase price remains undisclosed.

The price matters because a private investor exit can look economically very different depending on whether tokens were repurchased near the investors’ original cost basis, at current market value or at another negotiated valuation.

Why APR price and volume jumped around the announcement

APR experienced a major increase in trading activity around the restructuring announcement.

At our August 13 snapshot, CoinMarketCap showed:

• APR price: approximately $0.484;
• 24-hour change: +34.8%;
• 24-hour low: approximately $0.334;
• 24-hour high: approximately $0.6186;
• circulating market cap: approximately $134.4M;
• FDV: approximately $483.8M;
• 24-hour volume: approximately $122M;
• circulating supply: 277.81M APR;
• maximum supply: 1B APR.

The 24-hour price window overlaps very closely with the August 12 announcement, but it is not an exact event-study return. I would therefore avoid claiming that Capricorn’s announcement caused every percentage point of the 24-hour gain.

The combination of a rebrand, a large investor-repurchase headline and the possibility of a reduced October cliff gave traders a clear tokenomics narrative. What matters next is whether protocol activity grows enough to validate that repricing.

Was APR’s rally driven by spot buyers or derivatives?

This is where the market data becomes especially important.

CoinGlass showed approximately:

• $3.05 billion in 24-hour futures volume;
• $29.93 million in tracked spot volume;
• $109.17 million in open interest;
• and roughly $12.56 million of futures liquidations over 24 hours.

On CoinGlass’s tracked markets, futures turnover was therefore roughly 102 times spot turnover.

Open interest was also equivalent to around 81% of APR’s CoinMarketCap circulating market capitalization at the snapshot.

That tells me leverage was an important part of the move.

I would describe APR’s rally as heavily derivatives-amplified. I would not automatically call the entire move a short squeeze, because making that claim requires clean directional liquidation, funding and open-interest data through the specific rally window.

High trading volume proves APR changed hands. It does not prove that billions of dollars of new long-term capital entered the token.

What Capricorn actually builds on Monad

The token story should not obscure the product.

Capricorn currently describes itself as an “Intelligent Order Flow Coordination Layer for High-Performance Blockchains.”

The architecture grew out of aPriori’s work on order-flow segmentation, MEV-aware infrastructure, flow-aware routing and liquid staking. The basic idea is that not all blockchain order flow has the same characteristics, so execution can potentially improve when benign and more toxic flow are identified and routed differently.

Capricorn also operates staking infrastructure and an exchange on Monad.

At the time of research, Capricorn’s own website displayed approximately 27.06 million MON in TVL and 5,019 holders.

DefiLlama independently showed Capricorn Exchange at roughly:

Protocol metric	Snapshot
Exchange TVL	~$580,000
DEX volume, 24h	~$489,000
DEX volume, 7d	~$915,000
DEX volume, 30d	~$4.36M
Fees, 24h	~$1,503
Fees, 30d	~$12,063
Cumulative DEX volume	~$365.83M

Those numbers establish that Capricorn has functioning products and measurable activity. They do not yet establish that APR’s current valuation is justified by protocol revenue.

The staking system also uses aprMON, a liquid staking token linked to staked MON. Readers unfamiliar with the mechanics can see our CryptoLinks guide explaining how crypto staking and liquid staking work.

Did the Capricorn rebrand change APR utility?

Not simply because the brand changed.

Capricorn explicitly said that APR remains APR, and current project documentation continues to place the token at the center of the ecosystem.

The original Community Incentives allocation was designed for mechanisms including future airdrops, staking rewards, governance incentives and partnership programs.

What I would not do is assume that APR holders automatically receive protocol revenue, MEV income or exchange fees unless Capricorn documents a live mechanism that routes those economics specifically to APR holders.

The distinction between aprMON staking economics and APR token utility matters.

The rebrand gives Capricorn a cleaner product story. Usage and documented token value capture still have to validate it.

APR still has a major FDV and dilution gap

The investor repurchase does not eliminate APR’s broader dilution profile.

CoinMarketCap currently reports approximately 277.81M APR in circulation against a maximum supply of 1 billion APR.

That means only:

277.81M ÷ 1B = 27.78%

of maximum supply is currently circulating.

Approximately 722.19M APR, or 72.22% of maximum supply, therefore remains outside CoinMarketCap’s current circulating-supply estimate.

At approximately $0.484 per APR:

• circulating market cap is about $134.4M;
• FDV is about $483.8M;
• and FDV is approximately 3.6 times circulating market cap.

This difference is why I pay close attention to the gap between circulating market cap, FDV and actual market liquidity when analyzing recently launched tokens.

FDV is not money invested in APR. It is simply current price multiplied by the maximum supply. But a large gap between circulating capitalization and FDV tells us that future supply still matters.

What the 5.3% restructuring does not solve

Supply issue	Status after announcement
1B maximum supply	Still 1B
Original 52.8M first investor cliff	Likely reworked, exact treatment still needs confirmation
Remaining Early Backer allocation	10.7% currently shown by Tokenomics.com
Core Contributor allocation	16% / 160M remains
First Core Contributor cliff	40M APR under original schedule
Foundation allocation	16% remains
Community Incentives	Large continuing emission pool
Ecosystem Growth	Large continuing emission pool
Repurchased 5.3% vesting	Publicly unresolved
Current circulating percentage	~27.78%

The repurchase may improve one of APR’s largest near-term concentration risks. It does not eliminate longer-term dilution.

The strongest bullish case for the APR restructuring

The constructive argument is stronger than simply “buyback equals bullish.”

First, Capricorn appears willing to intervene in a politically and economically sensitive investor allocation before its first major cliff.

Second, reducing private investor ownership and directing more tokens toward users and builders can improve alignment.

Third, if the entire original 52.8M first investor tranche has been removed from October and moved onto a materially slower community distribution schedule, effective near-term float growth could fall significantly.

Fourth, Capricorn has live products rather than a token-only narrative. Staking is active, the exchange processes volume, and there is measurable Monad ecosystem usage.

Finally, the rebrand consolidates the project’s identity around order-flow coordination, liquidity, MEV and staking infrastructure.

If Capricorn now combines that cleaner product story with transparent token distribution and increasing organic usage, the restructuring could prove substantially more meaningful than a short-lived market catalyst.

The strongest argument that supply pressure was only delayed

The skeptical case starts with one fact: the 5.3% of APR has not been announced as destroyed.

Those tokens can potentially circulate later.

If they move quickly into airdrops, liquidity mining, user incentives or ecosystem grants, Capricorn may have replaced a concentrated investor release with a more distributed—but still significant—emissions schedule.

The transaction price and funding source also remain important. If treasury assets funded the repurchase, there is an opportunity cost that cannot be evaluated without knowing what Capricorn paid.

The Core Contributor cliff remains another large event. Most APR supply remains outside current circulation. Derivatives activity is extremely high relative to spot turnover. And protocol fundamentals remain modest relative to APR’s current FDV.

Community distribution may be better aligned than private investor ownership, but it still needs transparency. The bullish version is broad, slow, product-linked distribution. The weaker version is rapid incentive farming followed by immediate sell-through.

Three ways the Capricorn APR tokenomics reset could play out

Scenario A: the supply profile genuinely improves

Capricorn confirms that the original 52.8M investor cliff is removed, places the repurchased tokens into long-duration community vesting, publishes transparent destination wallets and materially reduces October emissions. Product usage, liquidity and fees continue growing at the same time.

In that scenario, APR’s near-term supply profile would have genuinely improved even though no tokens were burned.

Scenario B: ownership improves, but emissions are mainly rescheduled

The investor cliff falls, but the repurchased APR begins reaching users and ecosystem programs relatively quickly.

Economic ownership becomes more community-oriented, but circulating supply ultimately follows a similar longer-term path.

That could still be strategically positive. It simply would not be deflationary.

Scenario C: the announcement proves mainly to be a speculative catalyst

APR price and derivatives turnover rise much faster than protocol usage, the new vesting schedule remains unclear, community tokens begin circulating quickly and traders shift their attention toward the remaining contributor and investor unlocks.

That would suggest the narrative reset happened faster than the economic reset.

My conclusion: the October unlock matters more than the word “buyback”

The first number I would focus on is 52.8 million APR, not APR’s percentage rally.

It connects Capricorn’s 5.3% announcement almost perfectly to the first tranche of the original Early Backer allocation.

That makes the restructuring potentially meaningful.

If Capricorn has actually removed the entire 52.8M concentrated investor cliff from October and placed those tokens onto a substantially slower, broader community distribution schedule, it has changed more than ownership. It has changed ownership, timing and near-term dilution.

If instead the tokens begin circulating rapidly through incentives, then the project has mainly changed who receives future APR.

Both outcomes can be more community-oriented than the original investor allocation. Only the first represents a major improvement to the near-term supply curve.

That is why I would not call APR deflationary, and I would not describe the transaction as a 5.3% supply reduction.

The total supply remains 1 billion APR. The repurchased tokens have not been announced as burned. The purchase price, funding source, settlement details and new vesting schedule remain unresolved in the public material reviewed.

The single most important question for Capricorn to answer now is simple: does the 5.3% repurchase cancel the entire original 52.8M first Early Backer unlock, and exactly when can those repurchased tokens enter circulation again?

Until that answer is public, my assessment is that Capricorn has made a potentially meaningful ownership reset. Whether it has also delivered a lasting dilution reset remains to be proven.

Frequently asked questions

What is Capricorn crypto?

Capricorn is the new brand for the project previously known as aPriori. It develops order-flow coordination, staking and exchange infrastructure focused on high-performance blockchains including Monad.

Is Capricorn the same project as aPriori?

Yes. aPriori announced its transition to the Capricorn brand in July 2026 after acquiring CapricornDEX.

Is APR still the token after the rebrand?

Yes. Capricorn explicitly stated that “$APR stays $APR.”

Do APR holders need to migrate to a new Capricorn token?

No token migration was announced in the rebrand material reviewed. Users should ignore unsolicited migration links and verify any future contract instructions directly through Capricorn’s official channels.

What is the APR Ethereum contract address?

The Ethereum contract tracked by CoinMarketCap is 0x5A9610919f5e81183823A2be4Bd1BeB2B4da2a20. Always verify the complete address and correct network before interacting.

What did Capricorn buy back?

Capricorn says it repurchased 5.3% of total APR supply from early investors. The announcement does not establish that this was an open-market buyback.

How many APR tokens does 5.3% represent?

Approximately 53 million tokens. More importantly, 52.8M APR equals exactly 5.28% of the 1B supply and exactly 33% of the original 160M Early Backer allocation.

Were the repurchased APR tokens burned?

No burn has been announced. Capricorn says the tokens are being redirected toward community incentives and ecosystem expansion.

Does the repurchase reduce APR’s total supply?

Not based on current evidence. APR’s total and maximum supply remain listed at 1 billion tokens.

How does the repurchase affect the October investor unlock?

It appears designed to reduce or restructure it, but the final amount remains unresolved. If the entire original 52.8M first investor tranche is removed, October supply pressure falls substantially. If the remaining 10.7% Early Backer pool retains the old cliff, roughly 35.31M investor APR could still unlock.

Why did APR price rise?

APR repriced during a period combining the Capricorn rebrand, investor-repurchase narrative and sharply higher trading activity. Derivatives turnover was particularly large, so leverage likely amplified the move.

Was APR’s rally a short squeeze?

Derivatives clearly played a major role, but the available evidence is not sufficient to label the entire rally a short squeeze. A proper squeeze diagnosis requires directional liquidation, funding and open-interest changes through the precise event window.

How much APR is currently circulating?

Approximately 277.81 million APR, or 27.78% of the 1 billion maximum supply, was circulating at the August 13 snapshot.

What is the biggest risk after the repurchase?

The biggest tokenomics risk is uncertainty around the new vesting schedule. Other risks include remaining contributor and investor dilution, incentive-related selling, derivatives-driven volatility, limited market depth and protocol adoption failing to keep pace with valuation.

Sources and methodology

Market-data snapshot: August 13, 2026, approximately 09:20 UTC. Crypto prices, market capitalization, derivatives positions, TVL and protocol usage change continuously.

• Capricorn investor repurchase announcement — primary source for the 5.3% Early Investor repurchase and intended community/ecosystem redirection.
• Capricorn rebrand announcement — primary source connecting aPriori and Capricorn and confirming that APR remains APR.
• Original aPriori “Introducing APR” tokenomics — historical baseline for the 1B supply, original allocations and vesting schedules.
• Current Capricorn APR documentation — current project documentation and token positioning.
• Tokenomics.com APR tokenomics — current allocation snapshot showing 10.7% Early Backers and 5.3% Investors Repurchase, with the repurchase vesting currently undisclosed.
• CoinMarketCap Capricorn APR — price, circulating supply, maximum supply, market capitalization, FDV, volume and Ethereum contract cross-check.
• CoinGlass APR derivatives data — futures volume, spot volume, open interest and liquidations.
• Capricorn official website — current project identity, staking TVL, holder figures and ecosystem.
• DefiLlama Capricorn — independent DEX TVL, volume and fee metrics.
• APR on Etherscan — Ethereum token contract reference.

The 52.8M figure is reconstructed from Capricorn/aPriori’s original tokenomics: 160M original Early Backer allocation × 33% first release = 52.8M APR. Capricorn’s announcement states 5.3% of total supply; it does not separately disclose the exact transaction amount as 52.8M in the announcement reviewed.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal or tax advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, token unlock schedules can change, and on-chain transactions are generally irreversible.

“`